DOWNLOAD ANNUAL REPORT AS PDF HERE .
In 2018–19 Copyright Agency:
- enabled copying and sharing of content by millions of Australians without the individual copyright clearances otherwise required, including:
- nearly 3.9 million school students in more than 9,400 schools
- nearly 300,000 teaching staff
- 4 million university students
- 130,000 university staff
- students in more than 1,000 other education institutions, such as registered training providers; and
- more than 850,000 government employees
- paid $116m to more than 9,500 content creators
- paid more than $690,000 in artists’ resale royalties to 351 artists
- allocated more than $1.5m from its Cultural Fund (members’ contribution of 1.5% of licence revenue) to support 58 projects, 11 IGNITE grants, 6 CREATE grants and 5 fellowships
- licensed 104 new commercial clients and extended 853 licences to cover additional content and uses, resulting in a 10.5% increase in licence fees from the corporate sector
- reached a new four-year agreement with the Copyright Advisory Group for the COAG Education Council for the school sector
- reached a new three-year agreement with the Copyright Advisory Group for the COAG Education Council for most of the TAFE sector
- negotiated a new three-year agreement with representatives of Victorian TAFEs
- licensed, under individual agreements, 1,043 other education institutions (such as registered training organisations), 74 of which are newly licensed institutions
- commenced proceedings in the Copyright Tribunal for review of the copyright fees paid by the university sector and monitoring mechanisms
- processed nearly 88,000 survey records of copying in schools (comprising nearly 480,000 pages) and more than 17,000 survey records of copying in universities (comprising more than 500,000 pages)
- increased Reading Australia subscribers by 20% to 16,500, and added 22 new teaching resources for schools
- participated in government reviews of copyright law (Copyright Modernisation review)
- launched (with other collecting societies) a new website for the Code of Conduct for Copyright Collecting Societies and substantially revised the Code in line with recommendations from a government review
|What we do||On behalf of creators of text and images, we negotiate, collect and distribute copyright fees and royalties. We also represent our members on matters affecting their rights. We are known as a ‘copyright management organisation’ or ‘collecting society’|
|Structure||We are a not-for-profit company limited by guarantee.|
|Members||We have more than 36,700 members, who include writers, artists, agents and more than 70 copyright management organisations in other countries. Through our membership we represent more than 40,000 Australian writers, artists and publishers, as well as writers, artists and publishers from around the world.|
|Government appointments||We are appointed by the Australian Government to manage statutory licence schemes and the artists’ resale royalty scheme.|
|Statutory licence schemes||The statutory licence schemes allow educational and government use of content without the permissions usually required, but subject to fair compensation to content creators.|
|Artists’ resale royalty scheme||The artists’ resale royalty scheme pays artists a percentage of the sale price from certain resales of artworks.|
|Agent for members||We also license our members’ works as their agent (e.g. for use in corporations, local governments and not-for-profit organisations).|
|Payments to content creators||We pay more than $100 million a year to content creators for the use of their works.|
|Cultural Fund||1.5% of licence revenue supports cultural projects through the Cultural Fund.|
|Other Australian copyright management organisations||We coordinate with other Australian copyright management organisations that manage licensing for other types of content.|
|Copyright Tribunal||The Copyright Tribunal can determine licensing and distribution arrangements, including how usage is monitored, that are not resolved by agreement.|
|Code of Conduct||Copyright Agency is a signatory to the Code of Conduct for Australian Collecting Societies.|
The objective of copyright law is ‘to give to the author of a creative work his just reward for the benefit he has bestowed on the community and also to encourage the making of further creative works’.
Copyright rights are granted by the Copyright Act. Copyright applies to designated ‘forms of expression’ such as writing, music and images. The ‘owner’ of a copyright has exclusive rights to do certain things such as copying, making available online, broadcasting and public performance. No registration is required for copyright: rights are granted ‘automatically’ on creation of a designated form of expression.
Copyright is a form of ‘intellectual property’: it is ‘owned’ and can be licensed and transferred to others. The Copyright Act determines the first owner of copyright (usually the creator). Creators also have ‘moral rights’ in their work (relating to attribution and the ‘integrity’ of their work), even if they do not own copyright.
The artists’ resale royalty right (artists’ entitlement to a share of the resale price for artworks) is often regarded as a copyright-related right, though it differs from copyright rights in a number of respects, and in Australia is granted by stand-alone legislation.
Rights usually last for 70 years after the creator’s death.
The Copyright Act contains a range of ‘exceptions’: activities that can be done without the copyright permissions usually required. The Act also contains a number of ‘statutory licences’ that allow copying and sharing of content (e.g. for education) without permission, but subject to fair compensation.
The copyright system is international, involving national legislation that conforms with standards in international treaties.
Statutory licences have been introduced for situations in which it was assumed ‘that, if left to themselves, the parties will be unable to reach a satisfactory resolution of the terms for the access desired’ for reasons that include ‘unacceptably high transaction costs in cases where individual uses would be too difficult to identify and control’ and ‘the user is in a powerful initial position and has been able to obtain a statutory solution in its favour’.
Statutory licences are compulsory for content creators but not for licensees: users can choose to make alternative arrangements with copyright owners for uses covered by statutory licences, rather than relying on the statutory licence provisions. Content creators have adjusted to the statutory licences, which were introduced a long time ago and enable efficient licensing solutions.
Copyright Agency is appointed (‘declared’) by the Australian Government to manage statutory licences for the use of text, images and print music by the educational and government sectors.
A statutory licence for education was introduced in 1980 following the recommendations of an expert committee, revised in 1989, and extensively amended in 2000 to enable digital uses of content (such as making content available on an intranet). In 1990, the Attorney-General’s Department produced guidelines for ‘declared’ collecting societies, which are reflected in Copyright Agency’s Constitution. In June 2017, legislation to simplify the statutory licence for education was passed (with effect from December 2017), in accordance with a joint proposal from Copyright Agency, education representatives and Screenrights.
A statutory licence for governments was introduced in 1968 as part of the current Copyright Act, following the recommendation of an expert committee, and was amended in 1998 to facilitate collective management.
Statutory licences are consistent with Australia’s international treaty obligations, and exist in other countries, but are more prevalent in Australia than elsewhere.
The Copyright Tribunal has power to determine a range of matters associated with statutory licensing, including the compensation payable, monitoring of usage, and distribution of compensation to content creators.
These figures are for revenue recognised for the 2018–19 financial year, rather than received in that period. 
|Other education providers||5.1||5.3||6.3||7.0||7.2||7.4|
|States & territories||4.7||2.0||3.9||4.1||4.0||4.2|
|Media monitoring organisations||12.0||12.5||12.1||18.7||19.5||17.6|
Each year’s distributions include some money received before that year, depending on when the funds and data for allocation were received. For more on payments to content creators, and funds received in 2018–19 for distribution in 2019–20, see Parts 11 and 13. Our gross costs in 2018–19 were $21.6m (14.3% of revenue) including operating costs of $20.8 (13.8% of revenue) and $0.8m of non-operating costs.
In 2018–19, Copyright Agency received a total of $151m, comprising:
- $147m from domestic licensing; and
- $4m collected overseas.
Copyright Agency distributed $116m, comprising:
- $99m to domestic rightsholders; and
- $17m to foreign rightsholders.
The statutory licence scheme for education in the Copyright Act allows educational copying and sharing of text and images provided there is fair compensation to content creators. Copyright Agency was appointed by the Australian Attorney General in 1990 to manage the scheme.
There is a similar scheme for broadcast content (e.g. documentaries, films and current affairs), managed by Screenrights.
The schemes now apply to both not-for-profit and for-profit educational institutions. The amount of fair compensation can be determined by the Copyright Tribunal if it cannot be agreed.
Most schools (all government schools, and most Catholic and independent schools) are represented by the Copyright Advisory Group (CAG) in negotiations for fair compensation and data collection arrangements. Most Technical and Further Education (TAFE) colleges (apart from those in Victoria) are also represented by CAG. Australian universities are represented by Universities Australia. Copyright Agency also negotiates individual agreements with more than 1,000 independent educational institutions.
For total revenue from the education sector, see 4.1 Revenue by category.
- reached a new four-year agreement with the Copyright Advisory Group for the COAG Education Council for the school sector
- reached a new three-year agreement with the Copyright Advisory Group for the COAG Education Council for most of the TAFE sector
- negotiated a new three-year agreement with representatives of Victorian TAFEs
- commenced proceedings in the Copyright Tribunal for review of the copyright fees paid by the university sector and monitoring mechanisms
- licensed, under individual agreements, 1,043 other education institutions (such as registered training organisations), 74 of which are newly licensed institutions
According to the Australian Curriculum and Assessment Authority, the recurrent government funding for school education in 2016–17 was $57.8 billion: about $15,000 per student.
Compensation to content creators under the statutory licence is less than 0.1% of this funding.
Under the new four-year agreement with schools, the amount per student is less than it was in previous years, and will decrease over the four-year period.
In September 2018, Copyright Agency made an application to the Copyright Tribunal to set a new rate and monitoring system for the university sector, when it became clear that these matters would not be resolved by negotiation. The last time that the Copyright Tribunal was asked to determine the rate for universities was 20 years ago. The Tribunal is scheduled to hear the case in September 2020. The Tribunal has made interim orders regarding the payments to be made by universities until it makes its final determination.
As at 30 June 2019, we had 1,043 individual agreements in place with education institutions, 74 of which are newly licensed institutions (43 commercial institutions, and 31 non-commercial institutions).
Roughly 57% of the individually licensed institutions are not-for-profit, and the remainder for-profit. The institutions include pre-schools, schools and colleges offering higher education degrees, as well as Vocational Education and Training (VET) level diplomas and certificates 1–4. Some offer specialist education, such as theological studies, business studies and English language training.
The for-profit institutions are mostly very large private colleges and registered training organisations (RTOs) offering tertiary education. The not-for-profit institutions include training arms of government bodies, private or community kindergartens, community colleges, smaller RTOs and charitable RTOs.
While we enter into agreements with these institutions individually, we liaise with peak bodies for various classes of institution with a view to:
- increasing understanding of copyright and licensing issues;
- providing licensing information to their members; and
- designing licences that are appropriate to the needs of their members.
Our licensing staff engage with the education sector in a variety of ways, including participation in education conferences and other events, webinars and individual training sessions. For example, in 2018–19 staff participated in:
- ACPET Conference – Canberra August 2018
- VELG Conference – Adelaide September 2018
- AIEC Conference – Sydney October 2018
- Community Colleges Conference – Sydney November 2018
- NEAS Conference – Sydney May 2018
- Early Childhood Australia Conference (with APRA AMCOS) – Sydney September 2018
- Insources VET Summit – Sydney March 2019
- VET CEO Conference – Sydney May 2019
The statutory licence managed by Copyright Agency allows copying and sharing of text and images for educational purposes:
- from any source, in any format, from anywhere in the world; and
- for any type of reproduction or communication (e.g. printing, scanning, photocopying, downloading, making available on a server, emailing).
The key limitation is that works that are available for purchase cannot be copied in their entirety.
Each year, a small sample of schools and universities participate in surveys of usage conducted by an independent research company. The design of each survey (including sample design and duration) is agreed with CAG (for schools) and UA (for universities), and those organisations participate in training of survey participants. By agreement with education sector representatives, survey participants record some uses made outside the statutory licence.
Uses made outside the statutory licence are identified and excluded when the usage data is processed by Copyright Agency’s researchers, in accordance with protocols agreed with education sector representatives.
The extent and type of information gathered about usage is affected by a number of factors including:
- the technology available to collect and process data;
- administrative burden on licensees and staff; and
- cost of collecting and processing data.
Licensees participate in surveys of usage for two quite distinct reasons:
- to provide an indication of the overall levels of usage (to assist negotiations on fair compensation to content creators); and
- to provide information about content used, to assist with distribution of fair compensation to content creators.
Some survey records are useful for the first purpose but not for the second (because they do not contain sufficient information to identify a rightsholder). In identifying survey records for distribution purposes, we exclude those that do not contain sufficient identifying information. Conversely, some information gathered in surveys is relevant to distribution, but does not affect compensation negotiations.
The table shows the number of records from surveys in schools and universities that we processed in 2017–18. In most cases, these survey records comprise a cover sheet with information about the copying, and a copy of the content copied.
Each survey record may show that numerous ‘pages’ were copied, and may show that those ‘pages’ included a number of separate ‘works’. For example, a survey record may show that 10 pages from a book were copied, and that those pages included narrative text, a poem, and images. Survey records from universities include course packs, which comprise extracts from a variety of sources.
Components of copied pages may be processed separately: there are different relative values for different types of content, and there may be different owners of copyright for various components.
The table gives an indication of the volume of processing, rather than a comprehensive report on all processing in 2018–19. The processing includes research to determine whether or not a use was made in reliance on the statutory licence (e.g. a use that has been directly licensed by a copyright owner is excluded). The table includes records for uses made outside the statutory licence, and therefore excluded from estimates of the overall extent of reliance on the statutory licence, and from distribution.
|survey records processed||‘usage’ records||‘pages’ processed||Survey period|
|schools: hardcopy||70,242||88,768||368,747||2018: terms 1–4|
|universities: hardcopy||878||1,411||18,780||2018: semester 2
2019: semester 1
Copyright Agency employs experienced data researchers who extract relevant information from the survey data, and supplement it with additional information about the content and the rightsholders (such as International Standard Book Number and publisher name). There are detailed descriptions of the role of the data researchers in the Data Processing Protocols (DPPs) agreed with education sector representatives.
As noted in the DPPs agreed with education sector representatives:
It is not always possible for researchers to retrieve comprehensive bibliographic information so as to verify rightsholders. Researchers are constrained by the quality of original data provided in the survey and the complex nature of the publishing industry. However, the role of the researcher is to identify and complete the citation as far as possible in the circumstances.
Given the need to confine costs to a reasonable level, the researchers do not identify every rightsholder for every survey record. They do, however, identify rightsholders for 90–95% of survey records (92% of the survey records from schools). This includes records on which a teacher has marked ‘source unknown’ on the cover sheet. At the end of processing, about 10% of the ‘total multiplied pages’ are not linked to a rightsholder.
Every year, an independent research company conducts two surveys of copying in a sample of schools for Copyright Agency. One survey records printing, scanning and photocopying in 252 schools over a two-year period, each for a term:
- NSW, ACT, South Australia and Northern Territory in the ‘even’ years (e.g. 2014, 2016, 2018)
- Victoria, Tasmania, Queensland and Western Australia in the ‘odd’ years (e.g. 2013, 2015).
The other survey records ‘electronic use’ (e.g. uploading to a server, downloading, emailing) in 100 schools each year, for a four-week period.
Different schools are surveyed each year. A surveyed school does not participate in another survey for at least eight years.
In 2018, there were 9,477 schools in Australia, with nearly than 3.9 million students: 65.7% in government schools, 19.7% in Catholic schools and 14.6% in independent schools.
6.5 Printing, scanning and photocopying by surveyed schools in 2017
In 2017, surveys of printing, scanning, photocopying were conducted in the following number of schools:
In total, there were 84,485 students in those schools.
The following figures represent content copied and shared in reliance on the licence managed by Copyright Agency: that is, uses that would otherwise have required a copyright clearance. Any uses recorded in surveys that were not done in reliance on the licence are excluded.
The 123 schools surveyed:
- photocopied 2.6 million ‘pages’ of content
- printed 412,000 ‘pages’
- scanned 13,500 ‘pages’
Taking into account the survey results for both 2016 and 2017, the calculated ‘pages’ per student is 157.88.
In addition, a survey of electronic use was conducted in 100 schools, with 3,617 registered participants.
The schools surveyed for electronic use copied or shared 1.63 million ‘pages’ of content.
The calculated ‘pages’ per student for 2018 is:
|‘Displayed’ (e.g. from a learning management system)||61.4|
|‘Published’ to students online (e.g. from a learning management system)||59.8|
|Downloaded, saved to computer, screenshot or digital photo||11.3|
|Printed, saved or copied by students (authorised by teacher)||7.0|
|Take a digital photo or screenshot||0.5|
In accordance with their new agreement for 2019–22, Copyright Agency and the Copyright Advisory Group to the COAG Education Council are currently working together on new arrangements for monitoring electronic use.
Not all uses of content are taken into account in licence fee negotiations. Uses excluded from consideration include those that:
- do not ordinarily require copyright permission;
- the content creator has notified us are directly licensed for educational use;
- are presumed to be directly licensed for educational use;
- are presumed to have no value (such as ‘technical’ copies); and
- are not practicable to ‘measure’.
There are two mechanisms for taking these uses into account in fee negotiations:
- uses recorded in surveys that are excluded in accordance with the protocols agreed with CAG and UA; and
- overall discounts for a class of excluded use.
Processing exclusions include:
- quotations and extracts of three paragraphs or less;
- material created exclusively by the surveyed institution’s current employees: teacher’s own work;
- media releases;
- examination papers/materials used for assessment purposes;
- advertisements and branded material; and
- content published by government departments and agencies.
Discounts are negotiated for uses such as the following:
- ‘small portions’;
- copying from ‘blackline masters’; and
- content that may lack sufficient ‘originality’ to be protected by copyright.
See our website for lists of the books teachers most often chose to copy in primary and secondary schools from 2011–16. The lists represent how widely the books were copied (that is, in the highest number of schools), rather than amounts allocated to those titles.
Copyright Agency has worked with international company Kortext to develop a new online product called Flex, which makes the task of preparing course reading material simpler and faster for librarians and educators. In the UK, librarians from more than 100 educational institutions use a similar product.
Flex has been successfully trialled in libraries at a number of education institutions in Australia and is now offered to education providers such as registered training organisations and non-university higher education institutions that have licensing agreements with Copyright Agency.
Participating publishers currently include: Allen & Unwin, Bloomsbury Publishing, Cengage, HarperCollins, McGraw-Hill, Pearson, Oxford University Press, Wolters Kluwer, CSIRO, Australian Academic Press and PsychOz.
Flex customers get access to participating publishers digital original files and high-quality scans from the British Library. Flex has in-built compliance checks. It also allows visibility of reading list content at a course level, and enables the assignment of content to students. We are also working on functionality to assist students with a visual impairment.
As at 30 June 2019, we had deployed Flex with two colleges, five were running a trial and a further eight had agreed to participate in a trial. We had also started early discussions about a trial with another eight licensees, comprising 20 colleges.
In 2013 Copyright Agency, in partnership with publishers, established the online subscription website LearningField, which allowed Year 7–12 students to use multiple digital textbooks per subject, from a range of publishers, in a searchable format, linked to the Australian and state curricula across a range of devices. It included more than 17,000 chapters from nearly 1,500 textbooks, as well as interactive content. LearningField was taken up by more than 60 schools, reaching 30,000 students.
In early 2019, Copyright Agency announced that the LearningField service would be withdrawn from the market at the end of the 2019 calendar year. This resulted from an assessment that the investment required to further grow the business, and risks associated with this investment, outweighed the benefits to the Copyright Agency’s members, in what is an increasingly competitive market.
The statutory licence for governments allows Commonwealth, State and Territory government departments and agencies to make any use of any copyright content for the services of the government. Copyright Agency has been ‘declared’ by the Copyright Tribunal as the collecting society authorised to collect and distribute ‘equitable remuneration’ for government copying of text images and print music. Copyright Agency also licenses, as agent for its members, the communication of text, images and print music.
The statutory licence does not apply to government-related entities that are not ‘the Crown’, or to local governments, but Copyright Agency offers other licences for them (based on authorisation from members).
Copyright Agency has received limited recent usage data from governments, which means that recent distributions of licence fees have been based on data indicating content available for use, rather than reported as used.
For total revenue from the government sector, see 4.1 Licence fees by sector.
- agreement negotiated with Western Australian government on payments for past and future sales of survey plans
- negotiations in train with ACT government on payments for past and future sales of survey plans
- agreement with ACT government on remuneration for general government use of content and the conducting of a high-level survey of content use
- negotiations in train with Tasmanian government on payments for past sales of survey plans
- arrangements in train for renewal of agreements with the Commonwealth, other states and Northern Territory for 2018–19
- ongoing proceedings in the Copyright Tribunal for determination of equitable remuneration payable by the State of New South Wales since 2012
The table below indicates the number of employees (full-time equivalent: FTE), according to the most recent reports we have received.
Members, including copyright management organisations in other countries, can appoint us as their agent to include their works in various licence schemes we offer. Licensees include corporations and not-for-profit organisations.
We offer ‘blanket’ annual licences, which cover uses of all works we represent. We also offer ‘pay-per-use’ (transactional) licences, including through an online automated facility.
The licences do not cover works that are listed on Copyright Agency’s website as excluded works, but do include an indemnity for uses of other works not represented by us.
Licence fees reflect the value of the licences (e.g. compared to other commercial licensing arrangements).
For total revenue from commercial and other voluntary licences, see 4.1 Licence fees by sector.
- 104 new clients and 853 extended licences to cover additional content and uses resulting in a 10.5% increase in licence fees from the corporate sector
- Continuation of monitoring program for corporate websites with infringing newspaper content, with a view to increased uptake of licences in the corporate sector
- Settled 12 infringement matters in the financial year generating in $28,000.00 in one-off payments for past use, and $54,020.00 in licence fees for ongoing annual copyright licences
- Continuation of proceedings in the Copyright Tribunal regarding licence fees payable by media monitoring organisations under media monitoring licences
In addition to our general licence for corporations, we have licences covering the specific requirements of:
- pharmaceutical companies
- public relations (PR) companies
- law firms
- Australian-based firms with offices in other countries
Other licence schemes include:
- media monitoring (as agent for newspaper and magazine publishers)
- inclusion of journal articles and other works in commercial subscription services
We offer licences for a range of not-for-profit entities, including incorporated associations, unincorporated associations, societies and unions. We have specific sector licences for:
- local governments;
- religious organisations; and
- civil celebrants
We offer transactional (pay per use) licences in two ways:
- an automated online service (RightsPortal); and
- a manual clearance service.
The automated service currently applies to newspaper content (text, but not images), and articles from scholarly journals.
For content not yet covered by the online facility, we offer a manual clearance service. Licensees make a request via the RightsPortal, and we respond within 48 hours. We liaise with the rightsholder, who decides whether or not to license and sets a price, and manage the licence arrangements, invoicing and payment.
Most of the users of these services are publishers.
The Commercial Licensing team engages with current and potential licensees in a variety of ways. In 2018–19, they conducted 80 training sessions with a range of organisations around Australia.
And the team participated in the following conferences and events:
- Association of Corporate Counsel – National Conference November 2018
- Public Relations Institute of Australia (PRIA) – Annual conference November 2018
- Australian Reporting Awards (ARA) June 2019
Copyright Agency licenses the use of fine art and other artworks. Most of the artwork licences are pay-per-use (rather than ‘all of repertoire’). There are also ‘blanket’ licences that cover agreed uses for all artist members, in advance of the use. The uses are reported after the event. This type of licence is used in conjunction with long-term licence agreements and to assist administration of high volume uses.
- over $1.3m was collected for members from artwork licences in 2018–19
- significant licences included those for the Gorman fashion collaboration with Mangkaja Arts, MoMA at NGV exhibition marketing, Federation Square animation, architectural uses at Pilbara Clinics and Cairns Performing Arts Centre.
- public galleries, auction houses and commercial licences contributed 70% of the licensing revenue this year, with commercial licences in fashion, architectural, merchandise and event uses.
- artists licenced include Tony Tuckson, Margaret Preston, John Mawurndjul, Picasso, Calder, Julie Dowling and many more.
- the John Fries Award continued to be recognised as an important national award for emerging and early career artists, with the finalist exhibition attracting over 800 attendees for the opening evening and 2,500 attendees throughout the course of the exhibition
- we were pleased to support Sydney Contemporary Art Fair and the Talks Program
The artists’ resale royalty scheme commenced on 9 June 2010. Copyright Agency was appointed by the Minister for the Arts to manage the scheme in May 2010.
The scheme requires payment of a 5% royalty of the sale price for certain resales of artworks by Australian artists. It also requires the reporting of all resales with a sales value of $1,000 or more to Copyright Agency, with sufficient information to determine if a royalty is payable. A royalty is not payable if the seller acquired the work before the scheme commenced.
There is a dedicated website – resaleroyalty.org.au – which has an online reporting facility, and online registration for artists and art market professionals to provide contact details.
- since its commencement to 30 June 2019, the scheme had generated over $7m in royalties for 1,821 artists from more than 19,000 resales
- the artists who received royalties are at different stages of their careers, from early to senior, and from different parts of Australia, including urban and remote areas
- 64% of the artists receiving royalties are Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander artists, who received 38% of the royalties
- 38% of recipients live in the Northern Territory and 18% in South Australia and Western Australia (mostly in regional and remote areas)
- in 2018–19 we paid more than $690,000 in artists’ resale royalties to 351 artists
|2018–19||Since June 2010|
|Resales subject to royalty||2,078||19,120|
|Royalties paid (exc admin fee)||$690,512||$5m|
The following shows the percentage of resales reported to Copyright Agency that met the eligibility criteria for payment of a royalty, by payment range.
Stakeholder engagement included:
- information sessions in conjunction with key art industry events to reach artists, art centre managers, arts workers and art market professionals;
- information sessions to artists via the professional development component of their tertiary education course and artist studio talks.
- information provision via our e-newsletter CANVAS; and
- articles written and circulated on the following topics:
- What artists are asking: when is a sale a resale and when does royalty apply?
- The Resale Royalty Right: Scheme Performance 2010 to 2019
Copyright Agency acquires data for distribution from a variety of sources, including surveys of usage by licensees and data that indicates content available to licensees. There are a series of processes involved in allocating payments to content creators based on the best data available at a reasonable cost within the relevant time period. These include analysing the available data, applying relative values for different types of content and uses, and identifying content creators. The processes are sometimes complex, accounting for the time between receipt of licence fees, allocation, and payment.
Distribution policy is overseen by the Board, and published on our website.
The Copyright Tribunal has power to review distribution arrangements for statutory licence fees.
The following table shows the sources of payments distributed in 2018–19.
|Licensee sector||$ m||%|
|artists resale royalty||0.8||1%|
The following tables show estimates of payments according to sources of content.
Our payments reach rightsholders in two ways: directly (from us) and indirectly (through a member who receives a payment from us).
In 2018–19, we paid more than $18m to ‘author’ and ‘artist’ members. Some of those payments (principally for books) were made with an obligation to share with other rightsholders (e.g. a publisher and/or co-authors). Other payments (e.g. most payments for artworks) were made without any obligation to share.
We paid more than $13m to foreign collecting societies to pass on to their creator and publisher members. And we paid more than $84m to members who are not authors, artists or foreign collecting societies. They are principally publishers of books, journals, newspapers and magazines. A large proportion of these payments were made with an obligation to share with other rightsholders, such as authors.
In addition to the payments shared with non-staff creators, publishers also have writers and illustrators on staff, and Copyright Agency payments contribute to their salaries.
In 2016, we requested information from the members who received the largest payments from us of licence fees from the school and university sectors (accounting for 80% of the payments to Australian members). Based on information provided, we estimated that individual (non-staff) creators received about 39% of licence fees distributed. The basis of that estimate is set out in our annual report for 2015–16.
|State||Education licence fees||Government licence fees||Commercial licence fees||Artists’ resale royalties||Other|
The amounts in 12.6.1 are for payments made to members in 2018–19, some of which may have been allocated in previous financial years. The amounts in the subsequent tables are for amounts allocated in 2018–19, some of which may be paid in subsequent financial years (particularly if the allocation was made near the end of the financial year).
12.6.1 All payments
|Australian recipients||Education resources creators||50,291,718||43%||925|
|Other core content creators||43,920,573||38%||7,399|
|Foreign recipients||Foreign collecting societies||13,360,265||11%||38|
|Other foreign recipients||3,577,690||3%||132|
The amount available for distribution to members was less than in previous years because of the proceedings in the Copyright Tribunal to determine the future licence fees and monitoring system. In May 2019, the Tribunal ordered that, pending the final determination, the universities would continue to pay the amount payable under its previous remuneration agreement that expired in December 2018 with half going to Copyright Agency (for distribution to members) and the other half going into escrow.
|Australian recipients||Education resources creators||7,145,231||35%||111|
|Other core content creators||5,365,242||26%||1078|
|Foreign recipients||Foreign collecting societies||5,355,924||26%||27|
|Other foreign recipients||1,930,545||9%||67|
|Australian recipients||Education resources creators||958,830||41%||325|
|Other core content creators||614,583||26%||934|
|Foreign recipients||Foreign collecting societies||232,616||10%||29|
|Other foreign recipients||89,981||4%||48|
12.6.5 Other education providers
|Australian recipients||Education resources creators||1,328,898||16%||326|
|Other core content creators||5,203,107||61%||1285|
|Foreign recipients||Foreign collecting societies||966,457||11%||23|
|Other foreign recipients||368,526||5%||64|
The distribution of licence fees compensation from governments in 2018–19 was (apart from that from survey plans) mostly based on data from various sources indicating content that was available to governments to use during the licence period (rather than information about actual use). We used different data sources for different types of content (such as books, journals, newspapers and images), in accordance with the best data available to us at the time at a reasonable cost.
|Australian recipients||Core content creators||1816575||40%||1210|
|Education resources creators||1033163||23%||275|
|Foreign recipients||Foreign collecting societies||863299||19%||23|
|Other foreign recipients||577813||13%||73|
12.6.7 Corporations and associations ‘blanket’ licences
The following table summarises the distribution of ‘blanket’ licence fees from corporations and associations in 2019. The distribution was based on data indicating content available for copying by licensees.
|Australian recipients||Core content creators||1,871,894||45%||933|
|Education resources creators||842,723||20%||194|
|Foreign recipients||Foreign collecting societies||716,288||17%||22|
|Other foreign recipients||379,176||10%||41|
We publish our distribution schedule on our website, with links to information sheets on the major distributions. The following is a list of distributions processed in 2018–19.
We make a deduction when we receive licence fees rather than when they are distributed. The deductions are in most cases based on projected operating costs, plus the 1.5% authorised by members for Copyright Agency’s Cultural Fund. The deductions for media monitoring and RightsPortal are fixed.
|Distribution type||Total $||Deduction|
|corporations and associations||5,487,800||14.35–15.68|
|media monitoring companies||12,935,081||10|
|individually licensed education institutions||7,166,197||14.55|
|overseas licence fees||2,667,098||14–15.42|
|writers in published collections||1,531,756||14.62–15.7|
Copyright Agency’s Constitution allows the Board to allocate up to 1.5% of income to cultural development through the Cultural Fund. The Cultural Fund supports a wide variety of projects each year.
In 2018–19, $1,516,937 was approved through the Cultural Fund for 58 projects, 11 applicants for the IGNITE Fund, six for CREATE Fund and five Copyright Agency Fellowships. Some of the funds approved are for release in subsequent years.
|Grants for Organisations||178||58||116|
|Fellowship for Non-Fiction Writing||57||1||54|
|Fellowship for a Visual Artist||45||1||42|
|Reading Australia Fellowship for Teachers of English and Literacy||16||1||15|
Some of the amounts paid were approved in previous years.
|Creation/new work, CREATE Grants||105,000||6.92|
|Mentorship/residency/PD, IGNITE Grants||46,440||3.06|
|Visual Arts Organisations/projects||88,950||5.86|
The following projects were approved for funding in 2018–19. These, and projects supported in previous years, are described in more detail on our website. In some cases, the funding was approved for a project spanning up to three years.
|Adelaide Writers Week 2019||$20,000||Writers’ panel sessions|
|Australian Academy of the Humanities||$20,000||Commissioning fees for writers: 50 Discoveries that transformed our understanding of humanity|
|AustLit, The University of Queensland||$26,450||Teaching and Learning with BlackWords|
|Australian Association for the Teaching of English||$5,800||Supporting English teachers with resources to select and teach Indigenous stories|
|Australian Centre for Contemporary Art||$18,000||Influential Australian Artists Series: Critical moments in artistic practice|
|Australian Library & Information Association||$50,000||Australian Reading Hour 2018|
|Australian Literacy Educators’ Association||$10,245||2019 ALEA National Conference|
|Australian Network for Art & Technology||$30,000||Synapse – where art and science meet|
|Australian Publishers Association||$30,000||Australian Inclusive Publishing Initiative|
|Australian School Library Association||$6,900||Writers in regional schools|
|Australian School Library Association||$5,000||Leading Learning in Literature: 50 years of ASLA Conference|
|Australian Society of Authors||$36,500||Developmental Mentorships for Writers and Illustrators|
|Australian Theatre for Young People||$15,000||Fresh Ink National Writers’ Program|
|Big Issue Australia||$22,000||Fiction Edition|
|Broome Aboriginal Media Association Aboriginal Corporation||$20,000||Goolarri Media: mentor& train emerging Indigenous playwrights|
|Centre for Media History, Macquarie University||$5,000||Brian Johns Annual Lecture series|
|Chicago Quarterly Review||$15,000||Special Australian Edition|
|Children’s Book Council of Australia||$12,000||2019 National Conference|
|Contemporary SA Inc (ACE Open)||$8,750||Writers’ Commissions|
|Express Media||$20,000||Toolkits for Emerging Writers|
|First Nations Australia Writers Network||$10,000||2018 FNAWN Workshop Canberra ACT|
|First Nations Australia Writers Network||$20,000||Poetry and Short Story Prize and workshops|
|Fremantle Press||$2,400||Showcase of new Authors from WA to local and interstate Festival Directors|
|Guardian||$30,000||Growing readership of Australian writers and books|
|Inside Story Publishing||$15,000||Ideas for Australian Cities|
|Island Magazine||$20,000||Contributors’ fees|
|Jumbunna Institute — UTS||$30,000||Blak Letter Law — literary collaborations linking Indigenous writers and jurists|
|Kaldor Public Art Projects||$20,000||Kaldor Studio: 5-Month Artist Takeover at Art Gallery of NSW|
|Kill Your Darlings||$7,240||KYD/Varuna Copyright Agency Fellowship|
|Literature Centre||$10,000||Celebrate Reading National Conference 2018|
|Macquarie University||$30,000||Research project International Rights Sales & Exports of Australian Books 2008 –2018|
|Melbourne Press Club||$25,000||Michael Gordon Social Justice Journalism Fellowships|
|Melbourne Press Club||$10,000||Supporting Young Journalists Project 2019|
|Melbourne University Publishing||$10,000||Anthology of Australian Prose Poetry|
|MPavilion||$16,000||Inaugural Writer-In-Residence Program|
|National Association for the Visual Arts||$50,000||Future/Forward National Conference|
|National Institute for Experimental Arts/The Big Anxiety Festival (NSW) UNSW||$6,620||The Big Anxiety Festival Writers Program|
|National Museum of Australia||$25,000||Living with the Anthropocene: Non-fiction essay collection|
|Perth Festival Writers Week 2019||$15,000||Support for three writers’ panel sessions|
|Perth Institute of Contemporary Arts||$25,000||New platforms for Artist Development & Audience Engagement|
|Plumwood Mountain||$5,000||An Australian Journal of Ecopoetry and Ecopoetics: contributors’ fees|
|Poetry In Action||$19,460||Unlocking the power of words: Performances for schools|
|Red Room Poetry||$12,000||Poetry Object Prize and Partnerships – Cross-Curricular/Disciplinary Outreach|
|Small Press Network||$20,000||Independent Publishing Conference 2019-21|
|Society for Children’s Book Writers and Illustrators||$9,432||International SCBWI Biennial Conference|
|State Library of NSW||$7,500||Going Places – Authors on Tour Project|
|State Library of Queensland||$10,000||Judith Wright Calanthe Award for a poetry collection|
|Sydney Theatre Company||$30,000||Investment in new writing and mentorships through the Emerging Writers Group|
|Sydney Writers Festival 2019||$25,000||Writers’ panel sessions|
|TLB Society||$7,000||Prize for Experimental Non-Fiction and related writing workshops|
|University of Queensland Library||$30,000||Copyright Agency Creative Writing Fellowship|
|UNSW PRESS||$32,000||The Bragg UNSW Press Prizes for Best Australian Science Writing|
|UTS Creative Writing Program||$40,000||Copyright Agency NEW Writer-in-Residence Program|
|Walkley Foundation||$12,000||Advancing Australian arts journalism and criticism|
|WestWords||$25,000||Writers in schools in Western Sydney|
|Wheeler Centre||$15,000||Residential Hot Desk Fellowship|
|Writing NSW||$10,000||Boundless: Showcasing and Supporting Culturally Diverse Writers|
The following applicants were successful for IGNITE Grants in 2018–19.
|Winnie Dunn||$5,000||Mentorship with Dr Michael Mohammed Ahmad to develop Tongan-Australian literature in Western Sydney and to develop her creative writing practice in prose and autobiographical fiction.|
|Madelaine Dickie||$5,000||A month-long structured residency at Arquetopia International Artists Residency in Oaxaca, Mexico and will complete a first draft of her third novel, a literary surf noir crime thriller set in Mexico and Western Australia.|
|Lisa Sammut||$5,000||An eight-week structured Studio Program at Heima Art Residency (Iceland), a one–week intensive Mentorship in Video & Installation Art with Laure Prouvost (France) and a period of research at the Venice Biennale (Italy).|
|Janine Mikosza||$4,800||A six-month structured mentorship with US writer Sarah Sentilles to finish a full draft of her creative non-fiction manuscript.|
|Kaitlyn Plyley||$4,240||A structured mentorship with writer, editor and critic Fiona Wright.|
|Ronnie Scott||$4,000||Mentorship with Alexander Chee at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire.|
|Alana Hunt||$5,000||Mentorship with Ross Gibson and residencies with Perth Institute of Contemporary Arts and Fremantle Art Centre of Western Australia.|
|Michele Freeman||$3,780||Mentorship with Catherine Cole to complete a final draft of her manuscript, her first full-length novel set in Sydney’s Western suburbs.|
|Adele Dumont||$2,640||A two-week residency at the Katharine Susannah Prichard Writers’ Centre.|
|Thom Roberts||$5,000||A structured residency at Socìetas Raffaello Sanzio in Cesana, Italy, with Director Chiara Guidi who, alongside Scott Wright, Artistic Director of Erth Visual and Physical Theatre, will work in collaboration to mentor Thom in new modes of storytelling, specifically using virtual reality (VR) technology.|
|Ellen O’Brien||$1,980||To attend the Acts of Listening Lab at the Centre for Oral History and Digital Storytelling in Tiohtiá:ke/Montréal, Quebec. As a visiting artist, Ellen will undertake an intensive mentorship developing her artistic practice and professional skills in a performance and innovation space that interrogates listening in post-conflict contexts.|
The following applicants were successful for CREATE Grants in 2018–19
|Lenny Bartulin||$20,000||To write a new novel focusing on post-war migrant life in Tasmania during the 1950s, 60s and 70s, alternating with the characters’ experiences during WWII in Yugoslavia and Germany.|
|Jane Rawson||$15,000||In this new novel, The Bureau of Wellness, Jane will investigate Australia’s – and the western world’s – move towards authoritarianism, xenophobia, self-interest and individualism.|
|Peggy Frew||$20,000||To write Intervention (working title), her fourth novel – a work of fiction set in contemporary Australia, concerning three adult sisters.|
|Lisa Jones & Julia Davis||$20,000||To create an immersive, multi-channel video installation, started during a previous residency with Sydney Trains. The new artwork will follow a journey into this subterranean landscape of “slow time” using a wide range of materials and processes including drawing, video, sculpture and installation.|
|Jennifer Mills||$20,000||The Airways (novel) is a philosophical thriller that uses the ghost story and the idea of possession to explore queer embodiment, love and survival, memory and forgetting, grief, shame, and desire.|
|Josephine Rowe||$10,000||To support the final development stage of a new fiction collection, Horse Latitudes.|
|Author Fellowship||$80,000||Jeff Sparrow, to reframe discussions of humanity’s relationship with the natural world in the context of climate change.|
|Fellowship for Non-Fiction Writing||$80,000||Bernadette Brennan, to write a biography on award-winning Australian short-story writer Gillian Mears.|
|Fellowship for a Visual Artist||$80,000||Karla Dickens, for a multimedia installation that will celebrate the lives of Indigenous boxers and the famous Lismore acrobat Cornelius Sullivan.|
|Reading Australia Fellowship for Teachers of English and Literacy||$15,000||Alex Wharton from Carinya Christian School in Gunnedah, NSW, will explore best practice around teaching Indigenous literature in the classroom to develop a greater understanding of the issues, protocols and sensitivities involved.|
|Publisher Fellowship||$15,000||Justin Ractliffe – Publisher consumer insight research project.
Reading Australia (readingaustralia.com.au) is a Copyright Agency initiative to assist the teaching and reading of Australian literature in Australian schools and universities. The Cultural Fund allocates approximately $100,000 a year to Reading Australia for:
- commissioning new resources and material for teachers;
- partnerships with education, libraries and writers’ organisations; and
- conferences and stakeholder engagement and for website development
- Reading Australia Fellowship for Teachers of English and Literacy
It has been developed in partnership with the Australian Association for the Teaching of English, the Primary English Teaching Association Australia, the Australian Literacy Educators Association and the Association for the Study of Australian Literature.
Reading Australia began as a list of 200 books chosen by a panel from the Australian Society of Authors to celebrate the work of leading Australian writers and illustrators. There are now a further 150 titles, covering all genres and periods of Australia’s literary history.
There are now 178 resources total aimed at Foundation to Senior Secondary. The educational resources are designed to help teachers navigate Australian texts within the framework of the Australian Curriculum. The secondary-level titles are also accompanied by essays written by eminent authors, academics and critics. The website also has video interviews with authors, including 10 created in partnership with ABC Splash, and podcasts from The Garret to a number of resources.
20 titles have had AustLit trails created for them. These trails are curated collections of information covering the title’s context, themes, and more, as well as links to academic research and publications.
13.6.1 Developments in 2018–19
- 3% increase in subscriber numbers from 13,712 to 16,500.
- new resources:
- 13 new teacher resources for secondary students – 108 in total.
- 9 new resources for primary schools – 70 in total.
- Brenton E McKenna and Angela Ramirez commissioned to create colouring sheets for the Reading Australia illustrator gallery.
- partnership with Magabala Books to create resources for 22 titles on their list. Sixteen published to date.
- partnership with The Garret podcast to include podcast interviews with Reading Australia authors and illustrators on the site. Sixteen published to date.
- partnership with Australian Library and Information Association to create a series of competitions aimed at reaching more teacher librarians.
- conference participation:
- July 2018, AATE/ALEA National Conference in Perth.
- November 2018, ETA NSW conference in Sydney.
- April Geography Teachers’ Association NSW & ACT in Sydney
- April 2019 Australian School Library Association National Conference, Canberra
At any given time, we are holding money for payment to rightsholders and reserves. The amount of money for payment to rightsholders changes significantly over the course of a year, increasing with the receipt of licence fees, and decreasing with the payments to rightsholders.
The reasons that licence fees may not have been paid at a given date include:
- the licence fees were only recently received;
- we have not yet received the information needed to allocate to rightsholders; and
- fees have been allocated, but not yet paid, to rightsholders.
As at 30 June 2019, we were holding there was $27.3m for payment to members representing:
|Licence fees received but not yet allocated||11.8|
|Licence fees allocated but not yet paid||11.6|
|Unpaid allocations for return to members as reduction in operating costs||3.9|
The table below shows licence fees invoiced to 30 June 2019 that have not yet been allocated. The amounts are fees available for allocation after our deductions for anticipated operating costs. They include some licence fees that were invoiced before 30 June 2019, but received in the 2019–20 financial year.
|Licence sector||To be allocated $m|
Licence fees of $58.2m were due from the school sector in April 2019, and allocated to rightsholders in June 2019. Most allocations were paid to rightsholders by 30 June.
Licence fees payable under the agreement with Universities Australia in place until December 2018 were due in July and October 2018, and allocated in December 2018. Licence fees payable to Copyright Agency for distribution to members after termination of that agreement were invoiced in May 2019 following the Copyright Tribunal determination regarding interim payments by universities pending finalisation of the application before the Tribunal. Those licence fees were allocated in June, and most were paid to rightsholders by 30 June.
The following is a breakdown of allocations that we are holding for four years.
|We have not yet received confirmation of entitlement to claim from a member||2.8||0.2||0.2||0.4||3.6|
|Rightsholder is not yet a member||0.4||0||0.5||2||2.9|
|We allocated a payment to a presumed rightsholder, but they are not entitled to claim and we are in the process of identifying alternative rightsholders||1.0||0.5||0.3||1.0||2.8|
|There is not enough information to identify a rightsholder, or we have exhausted all attempts to identify a rightsholder (where a number of potential rightsholders have informed us they are not entitled to claim the payment)||1.3||0.1||0.1||0.2||1.7|
|There is a dispute about who is entitled to claim, or clarification of entitlement is pending.||0||0||0||0.1||0.2|
An allocation that is unpaid after four years is no longer held for the rightsholder to whom it was made. The Board determines how these unpaid allocations are used.
We are currently holding $3.96m of unpaid allocations. The sources are shown below. This amount will be used over time to meet expenses, with the effect that the deductions from licence fees for operating costs will be reduced, and members will receive a higher proportion of licence fees.
|Licence fees from||2012||2013||2014||2015||TOTAL|
|individually licensed education institutions||–||0.07||0.07||0.13||0.27|
|Total unpaid after 4 years||0.09||1.46||1.00||1.39||3.96|
|Allocated to member but not claimed||0.13||0.01||0.02||0.01||0.17|
|Work identified: rightsholder unknown||1.55||0.06||0.12||0.02||1.75|
|Rightsholder identified, but not contacted or did not join||1.13||0.17||0.15||0.25||1.7|
|Foreign recipients: no agreement with foreign collecting society||0.2||0.01||0.04||0.03||0.28|
Copyright Agency receives applications for membership from hundreds of rightsholders each year. In 2018–19, more than 800 new members joined. These included rightsholders for whom we were holding allocations. Allocations to non-members are reviewed periodically to identify opportunities to invite non-members to join.
14.7 Reserves as at 30 June 2019
As at 30 June 2019, there was $18.2 in reserves, representing:
|Future Fund reserve||14.3|
|Indemnity Fund reserve||3.4|
Funds held as retained earnings are used for the benefit of members at the discretion of the Board. This includes funds set aside for the Future Fund and the Indemnity Fund.
The Future Fund was established in 2013 in response to such issues as the Australian Law Reform Commission recommendation for radical changes affecting licensing arrangements. In Canada, comparable changes to Copyright law saw a catastrophic collapse in some licensing revenues. The Future Fund was built up over several years from interest on licence fees and allocations that were unpaid for four years. As noted in the 2016 Directors’ Report, the purpose of the Fund is to ‘… safeguard and manage the rights of members including but not confined to taking such necessary actions in communications, research and advocacy … to the extent required consistent with the Board’s prudent judgment’. Further, the Board noted in the 2017 Directors’ Report that ‘The Fund may also be called upon to conduct litigation which is necessary to protect the rights of creators, for example, to clarify the role of exceptions in the Copyright Act 1968’.
In 2017, the Board reported that it had determined to maintain the Fund but that it would periodically review the need for it and any amounts no longer required for safeguarding members’ interests will be returned to members.
14.8.1 Funds allocated and spent to 30 June 2018
|total inputs for year||5.03||4.33||6.29|
|returned to operating costs||(0.20)||(0.75)|
|public awareness and advocacy||0.00||(0.06)||(0.12)||(0.16)||(0.04)|
|net movement for year||0.00||4.27||6.17||(0.36)||(0.04)||(0.75)|
14.8.2 Use of the Fund in 2018–19
In accordance with a Board decision to reduce the Fund over time, $0.75m was released from the Fund and used to meet the company’s expenses. This has the effect of reducing the deductions from licence fees for operating costs, and enabling a higher proportion of licence fees to be distributed to members.
Copyright Agency has an Indemnity Fund to compensate rightsholders for use of their content in connection with licences managed by Copyright Agency. For example, Copyright Agency’s Distribution Policy provides for an ex gratia payment to a rightsholder who can establish that their work was substantially copied under a licence, but who received little or no payment for that use (for example, because the use occurred in a school that did not participate in the surveys of copying that were used for distribution). The balance at 30 June 2018 was $3.4m.
|Funds for distribution and return to members||61.7||36.1||29.2||40.2||35.4||27.3|
Our operating costs are met from licence fees. For most licence schemes, we make a deduction for anticipated operating costs when licence fees are received, rather than a fixed commission. Deductions therefore vary from year to year. Copyright Agency’s Constitution also allows a deduction of up to 1.5% of revenue for support of cultural projects (the Cultural Fund).
Copyright Agency’s Board must approve the company’s annual operating budget. Any proposed changes to directors’ remuneration must be approved by members at a general meeting. The largest component of operating costs is salaries.
- Revenue recognised: $150.8m
- Gross costs: $21.6m
- Operating costs: $20.8m
- Non-operating costs: $0.8m
|Depreciation and amortisation||1.4|
|Sampling (surveys of content usage by licensees)||1.2|
|Information technology costs||2.1|
|Marketing and communications||0.4|
|Office running costs||0.3|
The following represents our operational expenditure as a proportion of our total revenue.
All employees have a position description outlining the responsibilities and key competencies required for their role. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are set each financial year and cascaded down from the senior management team to ensure alignment with the business requirements. They are then reviewed and agreed upon by employees with their manager, and performance objectives and targets are determined.
Our employees have one formal performance review each year, during which an individual’s performance is reviewed against the agreed objectives. Recommendations for annual remuneration are based on:
- the assessment of each employee’s performance against those objectives;
- benchmarking against similar positions in comparable organisations;
- overall company performance; and
- market and economic conditions.
Final decisions regarding remuneration are made after considering managers’ recommendations, external benchmarks and environment, salary relativities within the company and our financial capacity.
- In 2018–19, employee benefits expense was 8% of total revenue (60% of our operating costs)
- Staffing levels vary from time to time in accordance with requirements
- Staff include full-time employees, part-time employees and contractors
- In 2018–19, staffing levels ranged from 86.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) to 97 FTE
- At 30 June 2019, there were 88.5 FTE staff
- As at 30 June 2019, the median remuneration (including superannuation) for all staff was $120,285.
Staff remuneration greater than $159,175 as follows:
|Staff in range 2018–19||9||6||3|
Membership of Copyright Agency is free. Anyone with a copyright interest in a text work or image can apply for membership. Applications for membership are approved by the Board.
Until November 2017, there were three classes of membership: ‘author’, ‘publisher’ and ‘collecting society’. Since then, there has been an additional class of member – visual artist – as a result of the merger with Viscopy.
People can choose to be a member solely for entitlement to any statutory licence compensation allocated for use of their works, or they can choose to also authorise Copyright Agency to license reproduction and communication of their works. This authorisation is non-exclusive; they can also license these uses themselves.
For a number of reasons, we only make payments to members, but our systems enable payment to new members for past usage. And members who receive payments share them with others, including non-members. For example, many authors receive Copyright Agency payments indirectly via their publisher rather directly from Copyright Agency.
In 2018–19, 837 new members were admitted to membership. There were:
- 727 individuals and 110 organisations;
- 66 admitted as ‘publisher’ members, 521 as ‘author’ members and 250 as ‘visual artist’ members (some members were admitted in more than one category).
Many rightsholders are not direct members of Copyright Agency, but are represented by (and receive payments from) our members. For example, there are more than 1,800 writers represented by literary agents who are members, and more than 6,000 artists represented by Indigenous art centres.
Thousands of writers and illustrators also receive payments via their publishers, rather than directly as members.
The Member Services team answered more than 11,000 enquiries in 2018–19, mostly from members (compared to 14,773 in the previous year).
|Query Type||Jul-Sep 2018||Oct-Dec 2018||Jan-Mar 2019||Apr-Jun 2019||Total|
Many members are now getting the information they need from the online Help Centre: there were nearly 25,000 views of information on the Help Centre in 2018–19.
Of the 43% of customers who provided feedback on the response to their enquiry, 97% were satisfied with the response.
The Member Services team responded to more than 96% of enquiries within four hours.
The non-statutory licences offered by Copyright Agency are dependent upon the authorisation given by members to license their content, and the authorisation of foreign content creators through their collective management organisations (CMOs). Copyright Agency therefore has agreements with foreign CMOs that enable us to include foreign works in Australian licences, and to also collect payment from foreign CMOs on behalf of members when Australian works are included in foreign licences.
The maintenance of those agreements requires active management, affected by a range of external developments including changes in regulatory frameworks and business practices.
Copyright Agency is a member of the International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisations (IFRRO) and the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC). Copyright Agency plays an active role on the IFRRO Committees, and is on the Executive Committee of CISAC visual arts body, CIAGP. Copyright Agency is also a member of the International Association of STM Publishers, the Press Database and Licensing Network (PDLN), and We Create, the representative body for NZ creative industries.
Copyright Agency currently has agreements with 34 rights management organisations around the world who represent rightsholders for the text/image sector. All agreements are with IFRRO members.
Additionally, to support our visual arts licensing schemes, we have 38 agreements in place with CISAC visual arts societies, as well as 5 foreign artist estates/foundations.
New agreements in 2018-19: Kopiosto – digital bilateral agreement, Oct 2018.
We monitor for new opportunities to include additional repertoire under our voluntary licences, and to ensure that Australian rightsholders are appropriately represented in the international space.
Foreign revenue is influenced by many external factors, including fluctuations in usage, legislative changes, and variations to foreign affiliates’ business practices and distribution policies.
Revenue from foreign CMOs over the past 5 years:
In 2018–19, the top five sources of international revenue were:
|Copyright Clearance Center (CCC, USA)||$1,440,386|
|Copyright Licensing New Zealand (CLNZ, NZ)||$744,405|
|Copyright Licensing Agency (CLA, UK)||$403,477|
|Authors Licensing and Collecting Society (ALCS, UK)||$111,447|
- CA invited to speak at APEC-funded ‘Best Licensing Practices of Collective Management Organisations’ program run by Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO), 23 – 24 October, Taipei Taiwan
- Participation in IFRRO Annual World Congress, 22 – 26 October 2018, Athens Greece including presentations at the International Business Models Forum, Legal Issues Forum, the Newspapers and Periodicals Working Group, Visual Arts Working Group, Educational Licensing Forum. We also chaired the Asia Pacific Committee Meeting
- Series of meetings with IFRRO and partner CMOs including CLNZ (NZ), CLASS (Singapore), CLA (UK), Reprobel (Belgium), KORRA (South Korea), Kopiosto (Finland), CCC (US), JCOPY, NLA (UK) to coincide with IFRRO World Congress. We also met with the Common Law Group – Access Copyright (Canada), Copibec (Quebec), DALRO (South Africa), ICLA (Ireland), CLA (UK), PLS (UK), CLNZ (NZ)
- Hosted visit from Bridgeman Images (UK), Dec 2018, CA offices, in relation to image licensing in the Asia Pacific region
- Hosted visit from Copydan (Denmark), April 2019, CA offices, in relation to licensing schemes in respective territories
- Chaired IFRRO Asia-Pacific Committee meeting, 24 – 26 April 2019, Singapore
- Series of discussions with IFRRO, WIPO, and partner CMOs to coincide with IFRRO Asia-Pacific Committee meeting. CMOs included CCC (USA), JAC (Japan), JCOPY (Japan), JRRC (Japan), HKRRLS (HK), KORRA (Korea), PRCI (Indonesia), VIETRRO (Vietnam), CWWCS (People’s Republic of China), CLASS (Singapore), CLNZ (NZ), as well as publishing representatives from Thailand and Myanmar
- Participation in WIPO Asia Pacific Regional Seminar on Exceptions and Limitations, 29 – 30 April 2019, Singapore
- Participation in PDLN Annual Conference 26 – 28 May, Berlin Germany, including presentation on MMO licensing and side meetings with partner organisations across text and media sectors
- Participation in IFRRO mid-term meetings 4 – 6 June, Dublin Ireland, including presentations at the Legal Issues Forum, Visual Arts Working Group, and Newspapers and Periodicals Working Group
- Series of meetings with partner CMOs across text and visual arts sectors– including Pictoright (Netherlands), CLA (UK), ALCS (UK), VG Wort (Germany), PLS (UK), VG Bildkunst (Germany), Kopinor (Norway), Reprobel (Belgium), Stichting Reprorecht (Netherlands) to coincide with Dublin meeting.
We monitor and seek to influence policy developments that affect copyright-based licence fees and other income. We form policy positions in consultation with a range of stakeholders, including industry and professional bodies representing content creators.
We are a member of bodies that have a key advocacy role, such as the Australian Copyright Council. We seek to influence policy at the international level primarily through our membership of IFRRO.
In their responses to member surveys and other communications with us, members have indicated that they want and expect Copyright Agency to advocate for their interests.
The major developments were the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) report from its inquiry into digital platforms and a consultation on ‘copyright modernisation’ by the Department of Communications and the Arts. The final report from the inquiry into the Code of Conduct for Copyright Collecting Societies was released, and its recommendations have now been implemented by Copyright Agency and the other collecting societies.
Engagement in policy and advocacy included:
- response to the preliminary report of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) from its inquiry into digital platforms (May 2019);
- submission on New Zealand copyright issues paper (April 2019);
- response to ACCC Draft Guidelines for Copyright Tribunal (November 2018);
- submission on Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Bill 2018 to Senate Committee (November 2018)
- response to government issues paper on copyright modernisation (July 2018)
Copyright Agency’s stakeholders include content creators, content users (licensees) and the Australian government.
Content creator stakeholders include members of Copyright Agency, potential members, professional organisations for content creators (such as Australian Society of Authors, Australian Publishers Association, Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance, National Association for the Visual Arts, and Australian Institute for Professional Photography), and international affiliates.
Content user stakeholders include people who use content under licences (e.g. teachers, government employees, businesses), professional associations for those users (such as teacher associations and unions), and people who negotiate licence fees and other arrangements for their sector (such as Copyright Advisory Group and Universities Australia).
Copyright Agency’s main stakeholder relationship with the Australian government is related to its appointments by the government to manage statutory schemes and the artists’ resale royalty scheme.
Copyright Agency also has a stakeholder relationship with the Australian government, and with State and Territory governments, in their capacity as licensees, and as owners of copyright.
Other important stakeholders include other copyright management organisations (such as Screenrights and APRA AMCOS), and industry associations for content creators (such as those for music and film).
- Joint sponsorship of Parliamentary Friends of Books and Writing group
- Meetings with various Departments and Ministers (Communications, Attorney-General and Prime Minister’s Office) on copyright issues
- This Book Changed My Life panels at Writers Festivals
- John Fries Award
- Artists image royalty claim campaign 3
- Writers royalty claim campaign 2
- Major sponsorship of Miles Franklin Literary Award
- Major sponsorship of the Reading Hour with the Publishers Association and ALIA
- Sponsorship of the Australian Book Industry Awards, Educational Publishing Awards Australia, Walkley Awards for Journalism
- Sponsorship of Walkey Arts Journalism prizes
- Sponsorship of Sydney Contemporary Art Fair
- Monthly eNews, Creative Licence, issued to members and other stakeholders
- Quarterly eNews, Canvas, issued to visual artist members and non-members
- Quarterly eNews, Licence Plus, issued to business licensees
- Publication of Copyright Governance Risk and Compliance Guide
- Promotion of Inclusive Publishing Guides
- Regular meetings and presentations to staff and boards of key industry organisations
- Engagement with stakeholders via Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and Instagram
- Media coverage of Copyright Agency activities and issues
- Promotion of Cultural Fund grantees and Fellowships
- Promotion of Flex For Librarians to Private Education Provider
- Publication of Opinion pieces in media on copyright issues
- Promotion of new Code of Conduct website to all members (in conjunction with other collecting societies)
- Literary agents and publishers briefed in Sydney and Melbourne
- Member event held in Perth, Sydney, Hobart, Melbourne and Brisbane
- Training sessions about the Copyright Agency’s processes with business licensees and members on request
- Training sessions about the Copyright Agency’s processes with business licensees and members on request
Copyright Agency is a signatory to the Code of Conduct for Copyright Collecting Societies. Matters covered in the Code include governance and accountability, education and awareness, and complaints and disputes.
We report annually to the Code Reviewer on our compliance with the requirements of the Code, and the Code Reviewer’s report is published on our website.
In conjunction with the Government’s appointment of Copyright Agency to manage the statutory licence for education in 1990, the Attorney-General’s Department developed guidelines for collecting societies.
Our Complaints Procedure and Disputes Resolution Procedure are available on our website.
The Copyright Tribunal has powers to determine aspects of licensing arrangements, including compensation fees payable under statutory licences, and distribution arrangements.
- Final report from government review of Code of Conduct for Australian Copyright Collecting Societies released
- Undertaking by Copyright Agency and other collecting societies to implement recommendations in report
- New stand-alone website for Code launched 1 July 2019
- New version of Code, incorporating recommendations from government review, published 1 July 2019
- Code Reviewer’s report on collecting societies’ compliance with the Code of Conduct in 2017–18 published (now available on new Code of Conduct website)
- Report to Code Reviewer on compliance with the Code of Conduct 2018–19 (available on new Code of Conduct website)
 Number of employees covered by Copyright Agency’s licensing agreements.
 From statutory and voluntary licences, but not the artists’ resale royalty scheme.
 Principally Screenrights (broadcast content), APRA AMCOS (music compositions), and PPCA (recorded music).
 Report to Consider what Alterations are Desirable in the Copyright Law of the Commonwealth (the Spicer Report) (1959): this report preceded the introduction of the current Copyright Act 1968.
 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), available at jade.io/article/218245.
 Other forms of intellectual property include patents, trade marks and designs: see ipaustralia.gov.au/understanding-intellectual-property
 Creators have these rights in their work even if they do not own copyright.
 The primary copyright treaty, the Berne Convention, provides that parties are not required to have an artists’ resale right, but that if they do they must provide reciprocity to nationals of other countries that have the right. In Australia, the right is granted by the Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artists Act 2009 (Cth), overseen by the Minister for the Arts. One of the key arguments for the right is that it benefits ‘fine artists’ who receive fewer benefits from the copyright system than other creators (such as writers and composers) whose work is primarily created for copying and communication rather than the value of the ‘original’ version.
 For an overview of all the statutory licences, see Ricketson & Creswell, The Law of Intellectual Property: Copyright Designs & Confidential Information at [12.0]ff.
 Australia is party to a number of treaties, such as the Berne Convention administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), administered by the World Trade Organization (WTO). Australia is also party to a number of bilateral and other agreements that affect copyright, such as the Australia–US Free Trade Agreement.
 Ricketson & Creswell, The Law of Intellectual Property: Copyright Designs & Confidential Information at [12.0].
 For example, the use of print music in schools is mostly done under the AMCOS print music licence (www.apra-amcos.com.au/musicconsumers/musicineducation/schools.aspx) rather than the statutory licence, because it allows the copying of entire works that are available for purchase (provided the school purchases the requisite number of originals), though the statutory licence remains available to schools for uses not covered by the AMCOS agreement.
 Copyright Agency was ‘declared’ by the Attorney General in 1990 as the collecting society for the statutory licence for education, and by the Copyright Tribunal in 1998 as the collecting society for government copies of ‘works’ and ‘published editions’.
 Report of the Copyright Law Committee on Reprographic Reproduction (AGPS, Canberra, 1976), known as the Franki Report.
 By the Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000 (Cth).
 The Guidelines and Constitution are available at copyright.com.au/governance.
 Report of the Committee Appointed by the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth to Consider what Alterations are Desirable in the Copyright Law of the Commonwealth (1959), known as the Spicer Report, at 
 The statutory licence in section 183 of the Act allows the Commonwealth, States and Territories to use any copyright material for the services of the Crown. The amendments empowered the Copyright Tribunal to appoint (‘declare’) collecting societies to manage ‘government copies’. Copyright Agency was declared as the collecting society in relation to ‘works’ (other than those embodied in films and sound recordings) and ‘published editions’ in 1998. Screenrights is the declared society for broadcast content. For uses that are not ‘government copies’ managed by a declared collecting society, the government must (unless it is contrary to the public interest) notify the copyright owner and either agree terms with the copyright owner, or have terms determined by the Copyright Tribunal. The legislation does not empower the Tribunal to declare a collecting society in relation to ‘communications’ made under the statutory licence, but Copyright Agency operates as agent for its members by accepting notification and negotiating terms.
 Some other countries have provision for ‘extended collective licensing’, which is similar to statutory licensing but allows a copyright owner to ‘opt out’. This form of licensing originated in Scandinavian countries, and has recently been introduced in the UK.
 This includes licence fees that are currently the subject of proceeding in the Copyright Tribunal, from media monitoring companies, the New South Wales Government, and universities. See external auditors’ report, annexed, at pages 3–4.
 Revenue includes one-off ‘retrospective’ payments for past sales of survey plans.
 The current statutory licence, in Part VB of the Copyright Act, came into operation in 1990. It replaced the former statutory licence provisions in section 53B, introduced in 1980. The statutory licence was extended to digital uses in 2000, by the Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act.
 There are also arrangements for use of music in schools and universities through the music collecting societies, APRA AMCOS and PPCA.
 CAG represents schools on copyright matters to the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) Education Council. CAG is assisted by the National Copyright Unit (NCU), based in the NSW Department of Education.
 Since 2006, Victorian TAFEs have been represented by their own self-funded association, Victorian TAFE Association (VTA).
 There are 40 Australian Universities registered by TEQSA. UA represent 39 – the last one, Torrens University Australia is individually licensed.
 https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/tribunals/acopyt/2019/2019acopyt0002. See external auditors’ report, annexed, at page 4.
 See Copyright Agency surveys in schools and universities at static-copyright-com-au.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2018/03/R02134-CA-surveys-in-schools-and-unis-Jan-2018.pdf.
 This is partly in recognition that the teachers completing the surveys would have difficulty determining whether a particular use is made in reliance on the statutory licence or not. Uses not made in reliance on the statutory licence are identified by Copyright Agency’s researchers, following protocols agreed with education sector representatives. Licence fee negotiations take into account both these ‘exclusions’ from the usage data, and global ‘discounts’ for uses made outside the licence. Universities self-exclude some uses not made in reliance on the statutory licence, for example where the university believes that the usage is governed by a direct licence with the copyright owner.
 This does not necessarily mean that the work used is an ‘orphan work’: it means that insufficient information has been provided to enable us to identify its copyright owner (the licensee may have additional information that has not been provided to us).
 copyright.com.au/data-processing-protocols. As noted in the DPPs, the researchers’ tasks include to ‘complete (add missing information such as author, publisher full title, ISBN etc.) information provided on the survey records by the survey participants’.
 The 2018 data was not available in time for this report.
 In accordance with protocols agreed with the sector. For example, content covered by a Creative Commons licence, a licence that allows free use by schools, or a subscription licence that allows the use.
 ‘Pages’ means the ‘units’ of content (such as a page from a book, an image, or a page printed from a website) times the ‘consumption’ (e.g. number of copies or viewers).
 Taking into account the two-year cycle of states and territories.
 E.g. because the content is not protected by copyright.
 ‘Blackline masters’ are workbooks sold with a licence to the purchaser to photocopy. Survey records do not indicate whether or not the recorded use was covered by the licence.
 Such as the TV guides at issue in the High Court decision in Ice TV.
 The lists were compiled from data provided by the schools that participated in surveys of usage from 2011 to mid-2016. From this data we extracted records that related to publications for which we could identify an ISBN (International Standard Book Number) or ISSN (International Standard Serial Number). We then counted the number of schools in which each book and periodical was copied, but not the number of pages copied, or the number of copies made, both of which are taken into account for distribution of licence fees.
 The statutory licence is in Part VII Division 2 of the Copyright Act
 Screenrights is similarly declared for broadcast content.
 The legislation does not enable the Tribunal to ‘declare’ Copyright Agency for communication, only for ‘government copies’.
 See external auditors’ report, annexed, at page 3.
 See external auditors’ report, annexed, at page 3.
 Royalties are paid to successors in title after an artist’s death. The legislation allows for the scheme to be extended to artists and successors in title from other countries with similar schemes, by listing those countries in regulations. At the time of writing, no countries were listed.
 Resales for $1,000 or more.
 All resales must be reported, and Copyright Agency determines which resales are subject to a royalty. A royalty is not payable if the artwork was acquired by the vendor before the commencement of the scheme. Other reasons for a royalty not being payable are: the artist is not an Australian national or resident, and (if the artist has died), there are no beneficiaries with the requisite connection to Australia.
 In some cases artists elect to receive payment directly from the art market professional and in some cases artists decline payment for particular resales (e.g. charity auctions).
 Includes artwork licence fees since December 2017, previously managed by Copyright Agency for Viscopy.
 Includes pools for creators from multiple licence sources: for artist-owned images; for contributors to newspapers and magazines; and for contributors to journals.
 Distributions of licence fees from the education sector were based on surveys of usage in statistical samples of educational institutions. Distributions of licence fees from governments (apart from those for sales of survey plans) were based on data indicating content available for use.
 Includes downloaded documents, such as reports and images.
 Includes sources such as information sheets, content from CD-ROMs, posters, previous years’ exam papers, student theses from other universities. Also includes artists’ resale royalties.
 Includes fees paid for sale of survey plans in previous years.
 The amounts in those tables also exclude some licence fees set aside for separate distribution to artists and writers.
 Most recipients give an undertaking to on-pay any amounts due to others, so the number of ultimate recipients exceeds the number of initial payees.
 Including educational publishers in the private sector, educational writers and illustrators, and other bodies that create resources specifically for the education sector, such as teacher associations.
 Including journal publishers and contributors, trade publishers and authors, artists, print media and film/tv companies
 Including cultural institutions, arts organisations, community groups, charities, religious organisations, health and disability organisations, special interest associations, industry groups, professional associations, sporting groups
 Including colleges, universities and TAFEs
 Including government departments and agencies, and local government.
 Includes recipients of small payments that we have not categorised
 We had regard to the Attorney-General’s Department’s guidelines for declared collecting societies (2001) in determining the approach to the distribution.
 A small proportion of the amounts allocated in 2017–18 was paid after 30 June 2018, mostly because payment was contingent upon recipients confirming entitlement to receive an allocation. Similarly, some payments in 2017–18 were from distributions processed in 2016–17.
 copyright.com.au/cultural-fund. The deduction does not apply to artists’ resale royalties.
 Does not include adjustment of $1.6m for payments in transit and GST shown in auditors’ report at Note 11.
 This includes amounts that will be deducted for operating costs.
 This covers a range of scenarios such as: deregistered companies; estates and individuals where we have a name but cannot find any further information to enable contact; organisations that we have contacted but have not joined; and small allocations where the cost of identification and contact exceeds the allocated amount.
 In accordance with the Copyright Act, the Copyright Regulations, the government Guidelines for Declared Collecting Societies and Copyright Agency’s Constitution.
 There is a fixed commission from some of the commercial licence schemes.
 We do not make any deductions for the Cultural Fund from artists’ resale royalties or LearningField subscriptions.
 Employees who earn over the high-income threshold are considered ‘high income employees’ under the Fair Work Act 2009. The threshold for 2017 is $159,175 (includes superannuation guarantee contributions but not incentive payments)
 includes superannuation but not incentive payments
 Membership is open to owners of copyright and their agents.
 A member can be both an author and a publisher member. The class of membership determines voting entitlements for the two elected members of the board: the elected ‘author’ and the elected ‘publisher’ director.
 2,816 became members as a result of the merger with Viscopy, and 91 applied for membership after the new ‘Artist’ member category was introduced.
 In 2018-19 Sarah Tran chaired the Asia Pacific Committee. Adam Suckling and Sarah Tran also participated in the Legal Issues Forum, and were members of the Newspapers and Periodicals Working Group and the Visual Arts Working Group. Sarah Tran and Judy Grady were members of the Executive Committee of CIAGP, CISAC’s visual arts arm
 The Code is available at copyright.com.au.
 There are links to the declaration and guidelines at copyright.com.au/governanceShare Tweet